Vulnerability Note VU#319816
npm fails to restrict the actions of malicious npm packages
Original Release date: 25 Mar 2016 | Last revised: 26 Mar 2016

Overview
npm allows packages to take actions that could result in a malicious npm package author to create a worm that spreads across the majority of the npm ecosystem.

Description
npm is the default package manager for Node.js, which is a runtime environment for developing server-side web applications. There are several factors in the npm system that could allow for a worm to compromise the majority of the npm ecosystem:

npm encourages the use of semver, or semantic versioning. With semver, dependencies are not locked to a certain version by default.

For any dependency of a package, the dependency author can push a new version of the package.
npm utilizes persistent authentication to the npm server. Once a user is logged in to npm, they are not logged out until they manually do so.

Any user who is currently logged in and types npm install may allow any module to execute arbitrary publish commands.
npm utilizes a centralized registry, which is utilized by the majority of the Node.js ecosystem.

Typing npm publish ships your code to this registry server, where it can be installed by anyone.

When these three aspects of npm are combined, it provides the capability for a self-replicating worm.

The following steps are an example worm workflow outlined in the report provided by Sam Saccone:

Socially engineer a npm module owner to npm install an infected module on their system.
Worm creates a new npm module
Worm sets a lifecycle hook on the new npm module to execute the worm on any install
Worm publishes the new module to the user’s npm account
Worm walks all of the user’s owned npm modules (with publish permissions) and adds the new module as a dependency in each’s package.json.
Worm publishes new versions to each of the owned modules with a “bugfix” level semver bump.

This ensures the majority of dependent modules using the  ^ or  ~ signifier will include the self­replicating module during the next install.

The full report from Sam Saccone is available here in PDF form: npmwormdisclosure.pdf

The timeline provided in the above document is as follows:

Jan 1 2016 ­­ Initial discovery of exploit
Jan 4 2016 ­­ Initial disclosure + proof of concept to npm
Jan 5 2016 ­ ­ Private disclosure to Facebook
Jan 7 2016 ­­ Response from npm
Jan 8 2016 ­­ Confirmation of works as intended no intention to fix at the moment from npm.
Feb 5 2016 ­­ Shared the disclosure doc

Impact
An attacker may be able to create a self-replicating worm that spreads as users install packages.

Solution
The CERT/CC is currently unaware of a practical solution to this problem. Please see the npm Blog for details and also consider the following workarounds:

As a user who owns modules you should not stay logged into npm. (Easily enough, npm logout and npmlogin)
Use npm shrinkwrap to lock down your dependencies
Use npminstall someModule –ignore-scripts

Vendor Information (Learn More)

VendorStatusDate NotifiedDate UpdatednpmAffected11 Feb 201625 Mar 2016If you are a vendor and your product is affected, let
us know.

CVSS Metrics (Learn More)

Group
Score
Vector

Base
6.0
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Temporal
5.1
E:POC/RL:W/RC:C

Environmental
3.8
CDP:ND/TD:M/CR:ND/IR:ND/AR:ND

References

http://blog.npmjs.org/post/141702881055/package-install-scripts-vulnerability
https://www.npmjs.com/
https://nodejs.org/en/
https://docs.npmjs.com/getting-started/semantic-versioning
https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/shrinkwrap
https://github.com/joaojeronimo/rimrafall
https://blog.liftsecurity.io/2015/01/27/amaliciousmoduleonnpm
https://medium.com/@nm_johnson/npm-package-hijacking-from-the-hijackers-perspective-af0c48ab9922
https://github.com/contolini/pizza-party

Credit

Thanks to David Ross and Sam Saccone for reporting this vulnerability.
This document was written by Will Dormann.

Other Information

CVE IDs:
Unknown

Date Public:
25 Mar 2016

Date First Published:
25 Mar 2016

Date Last Updated:
26 Mar 2016

Document Revision:
44

FeedbackIf you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us email.