When you set focused objectives for the red team, you get your blue team to work the weak muscles they need trained most.
Red teams beat up on blue teams all the time. However, while there can be plenty of sore muscles on both sides, they’re not always the muscles that needed the most exercise: security teams don’t always learn as much from the bruising and battering as they could.
Enter “purple teaming” — an exercise in which every bruise and muscle strain has a purpose.
In a purple team exercise, the red team’s objective is to test the effectiveness of a specific security control or to challenge the blue team on a specific skill set.
The objective would usually be set by someone who is familiar with the security team’s needs — an incident response manager, CISO, or security operations director.
Chris Gates, senior incident response engineer at Uber, and Haydn Johnson, senior consultant of KPMG Canada, will outline the ins and outs of the technique Oct. 18 at SecTor Canada in their session, “Purple Teaming the Cyber Kill Chain: Practical Exercises for Management.”
“The mindset is about working together,” says Johnson. He likens it to sparring with a partner instead of merely shadowboxing in a mirror.
It’s also better than getting into a street fight.
Gates says the idea appealed to him because after years of being on the red team side and watching most blue teams fail to improve their defenses even after an exercise, he’d become disillusioned with his role.
“I wanted to be a fixer instead of a breaker,” he says.
Johnson and Gates gave a few examples of how purple teaming can be used: If an organization has implemented ways to limit the effectiveness of Mimikatz, for example, the red team’s efforts would focus on trying to run Mimikatz.
If the sec ops director wants his or her team to have practice responding to a malware attack on a corporate device on corporate wifi, the red team would build their attack accordingly.
Generally, the blue team would not be informed ahead of time, and they approach the event as a real incident.
Purple teaming does not need to be a Herculean endeavor; it merely needs to accomplish the particular objective.
At Uber, Gates says, the exercise might be an “active adversarial simulation,” but it might also just be a controlled test or a table-top exercise.
If the goal is simply to test the effectiveness of a security tool, Johnson and Gates explain, a purple team exercise may be as simple as an attempt to get a malicious email past the mail proxy.
Another key part of purple teaming is what happens after the exercise: both red and blue teams share information about their experiences — the attacks, the alerting and instrumentation, the detection and response procedures.
The goal of a blue team vs. red team exercise in this case is ultimately to make the organization better, not to be adversarial.
By purple teaming, “I get to see what my attacks look like on the other side, which makes me a better attacker,” Gates says.
You might think that this takes giant squadrons of people and months of planning.
Thompson and Gates say it needn’t be that way: One or two internal people, plus consultants as necessary, can get the job done.
Gates says, though, that while purple teaming doesn’t need a big team, it does need a mature team.
An immature security organization won’t have the knowhow to set the objectives and “know where the gaps in knowledge are.”
“I don’t think you can do it with a one-man shop” without consultants, Gates says.
Though they wouldn’t go quite as far as to say that purple teaming would save an organization money, Gates and Johnson say purple teaming lets them put time and money where it’s most needed in an organization.
Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad …
View Full Bio