Big vendors patch bugs nearly as quick as open source coders
Cisco’s decided it’s going to give 90 days’ grace on vulnerability disclosures, to let (mostly) commercial vendors catch up with their bug-fixes.
While the best commercial vendors – especially those with bug bounties and a public pro-security stance – are getting better at responding to notifications, they’re held back by laggards, Cisco Talos says.
The new policy means instead of 15 days from when Cisco turns up a vulnerability to its first report to CERT, the vendor gets 45 days before CERT is told.
The report to CERT triggers its 45 day timeline.
Talos’s Mitch Neff writes that proprietary software vendors’ average response time of more than 80 days from report-to-patch is held back by slow responders.
The average response time among the best commercial vendors was 38 days.
The most responsive of these vendors … share some common traits,” Neff writes. “All are large commercial vendors of popular consumer software, have taken a public stance on product security, and have active bug-bounty programs.”
Cisco Disclosure Timeline
Initial vendor contact;Protections released to customers who use Cisco security products
Second vendor contact if there is no response from the vendor
Vendor notification date published on the Cisco Talos vulnerability tracker website
Vulnerability report forwarded to CERT if there is no response from the vendor
Vulnerability disclosed by CERT per their coordination guidelines;Full disclosure of the vulnerability report on the Cisco Talos vulnerability tracker website after a patch or mitigation is released or the time limit expires
Their efforts mean such vendors are “competitive with Open Source companies in terms of time to patch” – with the open source world turning around patches in 42 days, on average (the best performer dropped a bug-fix on the same day it was disclosed). ®
Sponsored: Customer Identity and Access Management