Enlarge / This is the latest forecast released by the European model at 2pm ET Friday, showing an Irma landfall in Everglades National Park on Sunday afternoon. (credit: Weather Bell)
We have written a fair amount at Ars recently about the superiority of the European forecast model, suggesting to readers that they focus on the ensemble runs of this system to get a good handle on track forecasts for Hurricane Irma.

Then we checked out some of the preliminary data on model performance during this major hurricane, and it was truly eye-opening.
Brian Tang, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Albany, tabulates data on “mean absolute error” for the location of a storm’s center at a given time and where it was forecast to be at that time. Hurricane Irma has been a thing for about a week now, so we have started to get a decent sample size—at least 10 model runs—to assess performance.
The model data
The chart below is extremely busy, but when you understand how to read it, the data is striking.
It shows the average position error (in nautical miles) at forecast lead times of 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours (so, out to five days).
It compares several different classes of models, including global models that forecast conditions around the planet, nested models focused on hurricanes, and consensus forecasts.
Specifically, the models are referenced as follows:
Read 18 remaining paragraphs

Leave a Reply