Enlarge (credit: David Butow | Getty Images)
If there’s one thing the Internet likes, it’s a good slapfight, particularly when the arguing involves Tesla.

The most recent outbreak of hostilities began on Thursday, when Tesla-skeptical Daily Kanban reported that parts of the Model 3 production line had not yet been installed in Tesla’s Fremont factory.

The following day, Elon Musk used Twitter to let us know that plans to unveil an electric semi truck had been pushed back three weeks—from October 27 to November 17—because company resources were needed to “fix Model 3 bottlenecks” and to increase battery production for Puerto Rico.
That same afternoon, the Wall Street Journal claimed that the 260-odd Model 3s that have been delivered thus far had “major portions” built by hand.

That was strenuously denied by Tesla in response to a similar piece at Jalopnik, although the company did describe the Model 3 as being in “production hell.” Tesla also noted that it finds a strong anti-Tesla bias in WSJ‘s reporting. (We note that same day, WSJ stopped just short of accusing Tesla of “misleading shareholders.”)
One outlet that could never be described as having an anti-Tesla slant is Electrek, and it’s from here we find out a few more details of the problems the Model 3 is undergoing.

According to a report it published later on Friday, Tesla had to change the front seats and battery packs (as well as headlights and tail lights) as it figures out how to get its new model into genuine mass production.
Read 3 remaining paragraphs

Leave a Reply