7.4 C
London
Friday, November 24, 2017
Home Tags Capita

Tag: Capita

Eclipse Legal Systems, the Law Society’s sole Endorsed legal software provider, is implementing its Proclaim Practice Management Software solution at Anderson Rowntree, one of the oldest law firms in West Sussex.Established around 1850, Anderson Rowntree has an enviable reputation for results and service, and prides itself on its firm roots within the local community. Offering services across property, private client, family and litigation, the experienced team provide an entirely client-focused and efficient service, earning the firm a recommendation rate of over 98%. The 6-figure deal will see Eclipse implement pre-configured Proclaim work types for all staff to provide a core centralised productivity suite.

For financial management, Proclaim’s Credit Control Centre (CCC) will provide the firm with a central dashboard of key financial and payment information, including the ability to drill directly into bills, clients and matters.

As part of the implementation process, Eclipse will conduct a complete data migration from the practice’s incumbent system, resulting in increased efficiency throughout all departments. Furthermore, to ensure firm-wide compliance, Anderson Rowntree has opted for Eclipse’s integrated compliance toolset to assist with the extensive SRA obligations, and to provide an improved risk management strategy. Additionally, as part of the drive to further enhance client service, Anderson Rowntree will also take advantage of the integrated Proclaim lead management system, empowering the firm to track and analyse sources of new business, and streamline the inception process.

Taking this further, the firm will benefit from Eclipse’s integration with an online ID and AML service, providing end-to-end ‘one-click’ verification and instant on-screen validation. John Dickerson, Partner and Practice Director at Anderson Rowntree, comments:“It is crucial that we achieve our goal of staying ahead of the competition and strengthening our enviable reputation for outstanding client service. Proclaim will be fundamental to our future success, by providing a flexible central solution, embraced by all departments and therefore guaranteeing a consistent approach to matter management. “Proclaim will not only improve our internal efficiencies and compliance, but will also provide client-facing systems to enable an online service.

The fact that Proclaim’s scope is this broad made the system our first choice by a large margin.” *** ENDS *** About EclipseEclipse Legal Systems, part of Capita Plc, is the UK's leading provider of legal software solutions, employing over 160 staff at its Yorkshire HQ with a turnover of £10million. The firm’s Proclaim software system is in use by 23,000 professionals within a vast range of market sectors, territories and work areas. Proclaim is Endorsed by the Law Society (the only solution of its type to hold this accreditation) and integrates all case management, accounting, document management, reporting, time recording, task and diary functions into one desktop solution. TouchPoint is Eclipse's unique self-service system, providing an always-on, platform agnostic portal for law firm clients and business partners. Proclaim clients include: Eversheds DC Law (Move with us) Co-operative Legal Services Anderson Rowntree Carillion plc QualitySolicitors (Howlett Clarke, Lockings, Oliver & Co, and others) Eclipse's market territories include: UK and Ireland Latvia Australia Canada Nigeria Zambia British Virgin Islands For further information, please contact Darren Gower (Marketing Director) at darren.gower@eclipselegal.co.uk or call 01274 704100. Alternatively, visit www.eclipselegal.co.uk
Enlarge / This is how we used to mess with the results of elections.

The Internet has made it a lot easier.US Air Force photo reader comments 3 Share this story Even if the Russian government was behind the hack of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and various other political organizations and figures, the US government's options under international law are extremely limited, according to Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard law professor and former US assistant attorney general. Goldsmith, who served at the Justice Department during the administration of George W.

Bush and resigned after a dispute over the legal justifications for "enhanced interrogation" techniques, spoke on Tuesday about the DNC hack yesterday on a Yale University panel. "Assuming that the attribution is accurate," Goldsmith said, "the US has very little basis for a principled objection." In regard to the theft of data from the DNC and others, Goldsmith said that "it's hard to say that it violates international law, and the US acknowledges that it engages in the theft of foreign political data all the time." Goldsmith pointed out that when Director of the Office of National Intelligence James Clapper testified before Congress about a data breach at the Office of Personnel Management, which collected sensitive information on millions of individuals who had worked for or done business with the government, "He said, 'I'm really impressed with what they did, and I would have done the same thing if I could have.'" As far as the publication of the stolen data in a way intended to interfere with the US presidential election, Goldsmith noted that the US has a long history of interference in other countries' politics. "Misinformation campaigns are a core element of what the [Central Intelligence Agency] has done" since it was created, he said. Goldsmith cited a study published in August by Dov H. Levin of the Institute for Politics and Strategy at Carnegie Mellon University.

The dataset for the study details all 117 known times the US and the USSR (later Russia) attempted to manipulate the outcome of elections in other countries. "This was either supporting one side, or taking actions to denigrate or harm the other side," explained Goldsmith. "And 69 percent of this was the US." Bad precedents In 1989, as a young Navy officer, I got a front-row seat to one of the more overt efforts by the US government to influence the results of a foreign election.
I was in Panama, and the outskirts of Panama City were plastered with campaign signs for Guillermo Endara, the presidential candidate of the Democratic Alliance of Civic Opposition (ADOC), the opposition party challenging General Manuel Noriega's Democratic Revolutionary Party. The CIA funded Endara's campaign, giving him $10 million—a huge sum for a country of 2.4 million people.

As an independent commission led by former Attorney General Ramsay Clark found in a report, "It is the per-capita equivalent of a foreign government spending over $1 billion to influence a US national election (five times the amount spent by George Bush and Michael Dukakis combined in the 1988 presidential election)." I left the country just before the election, which Endara apparently won based on exit polls—though that result wouldn't stand because of vote fraud by Noriega's supporters.

A "dignity battalion" attacked Endara and his running mate with clubs. I returned in December to do a security inspection at Rodman Naval Station, only to find myself being ushered into a van to the nearby Air Force base in the early morning hours of December 20 to evacuate as the US "corrected" the election results with Operation Just Cause. There are many other examples, some of them less direct—such as US support for a 1973 coup in Chile that overthrew the elected government of socialist President Salvador Allende. Other US efforts to affect politics—even those within the Soviet Union—were more subtle.

Goldsmith cited an example in the early 1950s, when "[Nikita] Khrushchev trashed Stalin in a party meeting.

The CIA got a recording of it and leaked it to newspapers in an attempt to harm Khrushchev." "No piece of [the DNC hack] is different functionally" from what both the US and Russia have done in the past, Goldsmith said. What's different is that it's happening to the United States—and that doesn't feel good. Thanks to the Internet and the powerful asymmetric capabilities it provides, events like these are likely to continue.

Cyber-disinformation campaigns can happen "with an ease and scale that dwarfs everything that happened before," Goldsmith noted.

The threat of interference in politics through hacking and data manipulation might render all past precedents set by intelligence organizations moot. "Theft and publication of truthful information is small beans—what about theft and publication of faked information, which is hard to verify, or tampering with the vote itself?" Goldsmith said. "That could have huge consequences, the number of actors who could do this are many, and our ability to defend against it is uncertain." The Russian government has been preparing for this game for some time.
Individuals aligned with the Russian government have used social media disinformation, denial of service attacks, and hacking campaigns to shape the political landscape in former Soviet states and elsewhere in Europe frequently over the last decade.

China also has shown a willingness to use information operations to influence US politics—apparently hacking the networks of both Barack Obama and John McCain during the 2008 presidential election campaign, using information obtained about McCain's interactions with Taiwan to further its own political objectives. Echoing comments made by Edward Snowden last year, Goldsmith concluded, "The US has the most powerful cyber capabilities in the world... but we are very much also the most vulnerable, and we're going to be more and more on the losing end of the stick.
I think this is just the beginning."