Cryptowall brought in close to $100 million before it was shut down this year.
CryptXXX gathered in $73 million during the second half of 2016, and Cerber took in $54 million, the expert said. Smaller ransomware families brought in another $150 million, and the FBI has reported $209 million in ransomware payments during the first three months of 2016.
In addition to this $800 million or so in known payments, there are many other Bitcoin wallets that are unknown to researchers and uncounted, pushing the estimated total to $1 billion for all of 2016. “The $1 billion number isn’t at all unreasonable and might even be low,” confirmed Mark Nunnikhoven, vice president of cloud research at Trend Micro. “It’s getting difficult to track the amount of money flowing into criminals’ Bitcoin wallets because they’ve started to try and hide the transactions across a large number of wallets,” he added. He said that there was a 400 percent increase in ransomware variants last year, and he expects to see a 25 percent growth in ransomware families in 2016. “What we’re seeing is a bit of a maturation in how to execute these attacks, so we’re expecting a leveling off to a more realistic growth curve,” he said. But criminals will continue innovating because of how profitable ransomware is. “I don’t think we’ll see the 100 percent growth that we saw from 2015 to 2016,” said Allan Liska, intelligence analyst at Recorded Future. “I think we’ll probably see a 50 percent growth.” The markets for stolen medical records, credit card numbers and email addresses are collapsing, he said. “Not only is it taking a while to get paid, but they’re not getting paid as much as they used to,” he said. Meanwhile, ransomware is an easy business to get into, the payout is immediate, and it offers an ongoing revenue stream. “There’s no incentive for them to discontinue ransomware,” he said. Some experts expect growth to be even higher. Successful ransomware attacks will double this year, predicted Tom Bain, vice president at CounterTack. “The reality is that every single customer I speak to, anyone in the industry really, this is their number one concern,” he said. Better defensive technology and collaboration will help, he said, but the problem is going to get worse before it starts to get better. Gartner analysts estimate that there were between 2 million and 3 million successful ransomware attacks in 2016, and that the frequency will double year over year through 2019. “I think they’re right,” said Bain. But not all experts think the future is quite that bleak. Raj Samani, vice president and CTO at Intel Security, predicts that anti-ransomware efforts will begin to pay off in the next few months. “We’ll see a spike earlier on this year, but then I anticipate our efforts with law enforcement to be successful,” he said. Intel, along with Kaspersky Labs, Europol, and the Dutch National High Tech Crime Unit formed an alliance this past summer, No More Ransom.
Since then, more than a dozen other law enforcement agencies have joined up, including Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Colombia, France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Several other security vendors have also joined up. “Now that we’ve got more law enforcement agencies on board, and more private sector firms, we expect to see an increase in successful take-down operations,” said Samani. In addition to working together to bring down ransomware operations, the group also distributes free anti-ransomware tools. That, combined with more user awareness about phishing and better detection technologies, will combine to stop the growth of this attack vector, Samani said. “As an industry, we’ve started to develop new products, sandboxing, threat intelligence exchanges,” he said. “It is getting better.” However, he warned that malware authors do have one significant advantage. “There’s an asymmetry of information,” he said. “They have tools and services that will allow them to run their malware through all the anti-virus engines out there.
They can install our products and they know how our products work because we openly talk about them.
This is one of the big security challenges.” This story, "Security expert: Ransomware took in $1 billion in 2016" was originally published by CSO.
The Glass Room is a collection of art pieces designed to make you think of how you're selling yourself.
The National Security Agency can read your email. Verizon knows where you are at all times. Amazon is confident you're in the market for a new printer. We know these things about the weird world we live in, but few of us ever stop to think about what they really mean. Recently, a group of artists got together in New York City to change that.
Apple doesn't have a retail store on Mulberry Street in New York City, but at a glance, you might think it does. The Glass Room exhibit borrows heavily from the Apple Store design aesthetic: white walls, white ceiling, white podium, and even helpful "inGenious" staffers in matching white hoodies (see the photo below). But nothing is for sale in The Glass Room. It's a collection of art pieces designed to make you think of how you're selling yourself, maybe without even knowing it.
The exhibit is curated by Tactical Technology Collective along with The Mozilla Foundation, maker of the Firefox browser. The subjects addressed in The Glass Room are digital: online privacy, location tracking, psychographic profiling, the gamification of security, and so on. But the pieces themselves are grounded in the real world; you can see them, touch them, and in one case, smell them. Here are a few that stood out to me.
Forgot Your Password? (Aram Bartholl): We're so used to massive password hacks that we barely even notice them. In fact, Yahoo recently disclosed that it had compromised at least 1 billion more of its users' passwords. Back in 2012, LinkedIn held the record for the biggest password hack—a paltry 4.6 million. For this exhibit, Bartholl printed all 4.6 million of those passwords alphabetically and bound them into volumes. (I looked for mine; it wasn't in there.)
Subscribe today to the PC Magazine Digital Edition for iOS devices.
Random Darknet Shopper (!Medien-gruppe Bitnik): This artist collective created an online shopping bot and gave it a budget of $100 in bitcoins. They set it loose on the dark Web to make random purchases and have them mailed to the exhibition space. No drugs or pornography arrived; just random stuff. A copy of Mastering the Art of French Cooking, a Hungarian passport photo, and—featured in the Glass Room—a pair of fake Kanye West Nike Air Yeezy 2 sneakers.
Online Shopping Center (Sam Levigne): Amazon does a great job of identifying what you want to buy and getting it to your quickly. As a logical (perhaps inevitable) next step, in 2014, the company was granted a patent for "predictive shopping." Levigne's art takes the concept even further. As a Glass Room "shopper," you strap on a brainwave monitor and allow an algorithm to determine what your brain looks like when you're shopping. When Levigne first conducted this experiment, he had his bot shop for him on Amazon and Alibaba whenever his brain was in the "shopping state." I tried it, but so far, Amazon hasn't sent me anything.
Not all the exhibits at The Glass Room are art. Some are demos of real-world products and services. The Texas Virtual BorderWatch, for example, was a real-time camera system (live from 2008 to 2012) that let volunteers monitor the United States–Mexico border from their homes and alert authorities of infractions. Another, the Silver Mother ($299), is a monitoring solution for seniors that gives medication reminders, tracks sleep, and gives front-door alerts. And then there's Churchix, a facial-recognition system that enables churches to track attendance automatically—a whole new meaning for "witnessing."
Finally, at the back of the room was a "data detox" center. For those who were moved by the exhibit and wanted to make a change in their digital lifestyle, experts at the counter explained their options. We've reviewed a lot of the tools used to manage your privacy, including Signal, Ghostery, Tor, and more.
If The Glass Room made anything clear, it is that technology is the dominant force for change in the world right now. It is affecting our jobs, our home lives, our relationships, our environment, and even our bodies. I'm a big believer in technological progress, but not all of these changes are for the better. PC Magazine is committed to getting you the tools, techniques, and information you need to thrive in this new world.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go clear my browsing history.
For more, check out the January issue of the PC Magazine Digital Edition, available now via Apple iTunes.
The suspect, Sean Sharma, was arrested on Dec. 9 for purchasing a DDoS tool used to mount the attack, the FBI stated in a release.Since last week, the FBI’s International Cyber Crime Coordination Cell, or IC4, and other law enforcement agencies—including Europol and the U.K.’s National Crime Agency—have arrested 34 suspects and conducted interviews with 101 individuals.“DDoS tools are among the many specialized cyber-crime services available for hire that may be used by professional criminals and novices alike,” Steve Kelly, FBI unit chief of IC4, said in the agency’s statement. “While the FBI is working with our international partners to apprehend and prosecute sophisticated cyber-criminals, we also want to deter the young from starting down this path.” DDoS-for-hire services have increased in use to account for 93 percent of all distributed denial-of-service attacks, according to Incapsula, a DoS mitigation service owned by Imperva. Neustar, a real-time cloud-based information and analysis provider, confirmed that booters and stressors have grown significantly over the past four years. "A pretty large portion of the DDoSes we have seen are the fault of the stressors and booters,” Rodney Joffe, senior vice president and fellow at Neustar, told eWEEK. “And it has been a problem for 4 years.”The worldwide law enforcement action aims to carry a message to young offenders that what may seem to them as innocuous cyber-pranks are actually serious crimes that carry hefty legal penalties, the law enforcement groups said.The people arrested are suspected of paying for DDoS services to launch floods of data against websites and online services—often gaming platforms.“Today’s generation is closer to technology than ever before, with the potential of exacerbating the threat of cyber-crime,” Steve Wilson, head of the European Cyber Crime Centre (EC3), said in a statement. “Many IT enthusiasts get involved in seemingly low-level fringe cyber-crime activities from a young age, unaware of the consequences that such crimes carry.”Yet, Neustar’s Joffe doubted that the arrests will make much of an impact.“There are millions of kids who play games, and they don’t think this is illegal,” he said. “Or they understand that this is illegal, but they don’t think they are going to get caught.”Law enforcement agencies carried out actions in Australia, Belgium, France, Hungary, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the U.S.
The law enforcement organizations underscored that fighting the cyber-crimes require a collaborative effort.“No law enforcement agency or country can defeat cyber-crime alone,” the FBI said in its statement. “This demands a collective global approach.”
A further 13 organizations joined in October.
Among other things, the collaboration has resulted in a number of free online decryption tools that have so far helped thousands of ransomware victims to recover their data. This is just the tip of the iceberg – much remains to be done.
Together we can achieve far more than any of us can on our own. What is ransomware? Ransomware comes in two forms.
The most common form of ransomware is the cryptor.
These programs encrypt data on the victim’s device and demand money in return for a promise to restore the data.
Blockers, by contrast, don’t affect the data stored on the device.
Instead, they prevent the victim from accessing the device.
The ransom demand, displayed across the screen, typically masquerades as a notice from a law enforcement agency, reporting that the victim has accessed illegal web content and indicating that they must pay a spot-fine. You can find an overview of both forms of ransomware here. Ransomware: the main trends & discoveries of 2016 “Most ransomware thrives on an unlikely relationship of trust between the victim and their attacker: that, once payment is received, the ransomed files will be returned.
Cybercriminals have exhibited a surprising semblance of professionalism in fulfilling this promise.” GReAT, Threat Predictions for 2017 Arrivals and departures Arrivals – in 2016, the world said hello to Cerber, Locky and CryptXXX – as well as to 44,287 new ransomware modifications Cerber and Locky arrived in the early Spring.
Both are nasty, virulent strains of ransomware that are propagated widely, mainly through spam attachments and exploit kits.
They rapidly established themselves as ‘major players’, targeting individuals and corporates. Not far behind them was CryptXXX.
All three families continue to evolve and to hold the world to ransom alongside well-established incumbents such as CTB-Locker, CryptoWall and Shade. Locky ransomware has so far been spread across 114 countries #KLReport Tweet As of October 2016, the top ransomware families detected by Kaspersky Lab products look like this: Name Verdicts* percentage of users** 1 CTB-Locker Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Onion /Trojan-Ransom.NSIS.Onion 25.32 2 Locky Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Locky /Trojan-Dropper.JS.Locky 7.07 3 TeslaCrypt (active till May 2016) Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Bitman 6.54 4 Scatter Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Scatter /Trojan-Ransom.BAT.Scatter /Trojan-Downloader.JS.Scatter /Trojan-Dropper.JS.Scatter 2.85 5 Cryakl Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Cryakl 2.79 6 CryptoWall Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Cryptodef 2.36 7 Shade Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Shade 1.73 8 (generic verdict) Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Snocry 1.26 9 Crysis Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crusis 1.15 10 Cryrar/ACCDFISA Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Cryrar 0.90 * These statistics are based on the detection verdicts returned by Kaspersky Lab products, received from usersof Kaspersky Lab products who have consented to provide their statistical data.** Percentage of users targeted by a certain crypto-ransomware family relative to all users targeted with crypto-ransomware. Departures – and goodbye to Teslascrypt, Chimera and Wildfire – or so it seemed… Probably the biggest surprise of 2016 was the shutdown of TeslaCrypt and the subsequent release of the master key, apparently by the malware actors themselves. TeslaCrypt “committed suicide” – while the police shut down Encryptor RaaS and Wildfire #KLReport Tweet Encryptor RaaS, one of the first Trojans to offer a Ransomware-as-a-Service model to other criminals shut up shop after part of its botnet was taken down by the police. Then, in July, approximately 3,500 keys for the Chimera ransomware were publicly released by someone claiming to be behind the Petya/Mischa ransomware. However, since Petya used some of the Chimera source code for its own ransomware, it could in fact be the same group, simply updating its product suite and causing mischief. Similarly, Wildfire, whose servers were seized and a decryption key developed following a combined effort by Kaspersky Lab, Intel Security and the Dutch Police, now appears to have re-emerged as Hades. Abuse of ‘educational’ ransomware Well-intentioned researchers developed ‘educational’ ransomware to give system administrators a tool to simulate a ransomware attack and test their defenses.
Criminals were quick to seize upon these tools for their own malicious purposes. Ransomware developed for ‘education’ gave rise to Ded Cryptor and Fantom, among others #KLReport Tweet The developer of the educational ransomware Hidden Tear & EDA2 helpfully posted the source code on GitHub.
Inevitably, 2016 saw the appearance of numerous malicious Trojans based on this code.
This included Ded Cryptor, which changed the wallpaper on a victim computer to a picture of an evil-looking Santa Claus, and demanded a massive two Bitcoins (around $1,300) as a ransom.
Another such program was Fantom, which simulated a genuine-looking Windows update screen. Unconventional approaches Why bother with a file when you can have the disk? New approaches to ransomware attacks that were seen for the first time in 2016 included disk encryption, where attackers block access to, or encrypt, all the files at once. Petya is an example of this, scrambling the master index of a user’s hard drive and making a reboot impossible.
Another Trojan, Dcryptor, also known as Mamba, went one step further, locking down the entire hard drive.
This ransomware is particularly unpleasant, scrambling every disk sector including the operating system, apps, shared files and all personal data – using a copy of the open source DiskCryptor software. Attackers are now targeting back-ups and hard drives – and brute-forcing passwords #KLReport Tweet The ‘manual’ infection technique Dcrypter’s infection is carried out manually, with the attackers brute-forcing passwords for remote access to a victim machine.
Although not new, this approach has become significantly more prominent in 2016, often as a way to target servers and gain entry into a corporate system. If the attack succeeds, the Trojan installs and encrypts the files on the server and possibly even on all the network shares accessible from it. We discovered TeamXRat taking this approach to spread its ransomware on Brazilian servers. Two-in-one infection In August we discovered a sample of Shade that had unexpected functionality: if an infected computer turned out to belong to financial services, it would instead download and install a piece of spyware, possibly with the longer term aim of stealing money. Shade downloaded spyware if it found financial software #KLReport Tweet Ransomware in scripting languages Another trend that attracted our attention in 2016 was the growing number of cryptors written in scripting languages.
In the third quarter alone, we came across several new families written in Python, including HolyCrypt and CryPy, as well as Stampado written in AutoIt, the automation language. A long line of amateurs and copycats Many of the new ransomware Trojans detected in 2016 turned out to be of low-quality; unsophisticated, with software flaws and sloppy errors in the ransom notes. Poor quality ransomware increases likelihood of data being lost forever #KLReport Tweet This was accompanied by a rise in copycat ransomware.
Among other things, we spotted that: Bart copies the ransom note & the style of Locky’s payment page. An Autoit-based copycat of Locky (dubbed AutoLocky) uses the same extension “.locky”. Crusis (aka Crysis) copies the extension “.xtbl” originally used by Shade. Xorist copies the whole naming scheme of the files encrypted by Crusis. Probably the most prominent copycat we discovered this year was Polyglot (aka MarsJoke).
It fully mimics the appearance and file processing approach of CTB-Locker. These trends are all expected to increase in 2017. “As the popularity continues to rise and a lesser grade of criminal decides to enter the space, we are likely to encounter more and more ‘ransomware’ that lacks the quality assurance or general coding capability to actually uphold this promise. We expect ‘skiddie’ ransomware to lock away files or system access or simply delete the files, trick the victim into paying the ransom, and provide nothing in return.” GReAT, Threat Predictions for 2017 The thriving ransomware economy The rise of RaaS While Ransomware-as-a-Service is not a new trend, in 2016 this propagation model continued to develop, with ever more ransomware creators offering their malicious product ‘on demand’.
This approach has proved immensely appealing to criminals who lack the skills, resources or inclination to develop their own. Ransomware is increasingly for hire on the criminal underground #KLReport Tweet Notable examples of ransomware that appeared in 2016 and use this model are Petya/Mischa and Shark ransomware, which was later rebranded under the name Atom. This business model is increasingly sophisticated: The Petya ransomware partner site The partner often signs up to a traditional commission-based arrangement.
For example, the “payment table” for Petya ransomware shows that if a partner makes 125 Bitcoins a week thy will walk away with 106.25 Bitcoins after commission. Petya payment table There is also an initial usage fee.
Someone looking to use the Stompado ransomware, for example, needs to come up with just $39. With other criminals offering their services in spam distribution, ransomware notes etc. it’s not difficult for an aspiring attacker to get started. From commission-based networks to customer support and branding The most ‘professional’ attackers offered their victims a help desk and technical support, guiding them through the process of buying Bitcoins to pay the ransom, and sometimes even being open to negotiation.
Every step further encouraged the victim to pay. Criminals offer customer support to ensure more victims pay #KLReport Tweet Further, Kaspersky Lab experts studying ransomware in Brazil noticed that for many attacks, branding the ransomware was a matter of some importance.
Those looking for media attention and customer fear would opt for a high profile, celebrity theme or gimmick – while those more concerned about staying under the radar would forgo the temptation of fame and leave their victims facing just an e-mail for contacting the bad guys and a Bitcoin address to pay into. It’s still all about the Bitcoins Throughout 2016, the most popular ransomware families still favored payment in Bitcoins. Most ransomware demands were not excessive, averaging at around $300, although some were charged – and paid – a great deal more. Others, particularly regional and hand-crafted operations, often preferred a local payment option – although this also meant that they were no longer able to hide in plain sight and blend in with the rest of the ransomware noise. Ransomware turned its weapons on business In the first three months of 2016, 17% of ransomware attacks targeted corporates – this equates to an attack hitting a business somewhere in the world every two minutes1.
By the end of Q3 this had increased to 23.9% – an attack every 40 seconds. A business is attacked with ransomware every 40 seconds #KLReport Tweet According to Kaspersky Lab research, in 2016, one in every five businesses worldwide suffered an IT security incident as a result of a ransomware attack. 42% of small and medium-sized businesses were hit by ransomware in the last 12 months. 32% of them paid the ransom. One in five never got their files back, even after paying. 67% of those affected by ransomware lost part or all of their corporate data – and one- in-four spent several weeks trying to restore access. One in five SMBs never gets their data back, even after paying #KLReport Tweet Social engineering and human error remain key factors in corporate vulnerability. One in five cases involving significant data loss came about through employee carelessness or lack of awareness. “We are seeing more targeted ransomware, where criminal groups carefully hand-pick and spear-phish their targets because of the data they possess and/or their reliance on the availability of this valuable data.” John Fokker, Digital team Coordinator with the Dutch National High Tech Crime unit Some industry sectors are harder hit than others, but our research shows that all are at risk There is no such thing as a low-risk sector anymore #KLReport Tweet Industry sector % attacked with ransomware 1 Education 23 2 IT/Telecoms 22 3 Entertainment/Media 21 4 Financial Services 21 5 Construction 19 6 Government/public sector/defence 18 7 Manufacturing 18 8 Transport 17 9 Healthcare 16 10 Retail/wholesale/leisure 16 Ransomware attacks that made the headlines Hospitals became a prime target – with potentially devastating impact as operations were cancelled, patients diverted to other hospitals and more. Hosted desktop and cloud provider VESK paid nearly $23,000 dollars in ransom to recover access to one of its systems following an attack in September. Leading media, including the New York Times, the BBC and AOL were hit by malware carrying ransomware in March 2016. The University of Calgary in Canada, a major research center, acknowledged it had paid around $16,000 to recover emails that been encrypted for a week. A small police station in Massachusetts, ended paying a $500 ransom (via Bitcoin) in order to retrieve essential case-related data, after an officer opened a poisonous email attachment. Even motor racing was hit: a leading NASCAR racing team faced losing data worth millions to a TeslaCrypt attack in April. Fighting Back Through technology The latest versions of Kaspersky Lab products for smaller companies have been enhanced with anti-cryptomalware functionality.
In addition, a new, free anti-ransomware tool has been made available for all businesses to download and use, regardless of the security solution they use. A new free, AV-independent anti-ransomware tool is available #KLReport Tweet Kaspersky Lab’s Anti-Ransomware Tool for Business is a ‘light’ solution that can function in parallel with other antivirus software.
The tool uses two components needed for the early detection of Trojans: the distributed Kaspersky Security Network and System Watcher, which monitors applications’ activity. Kaspersky Security Network quickly checks the reputation of files and website URLs through the cloud, and System Watcher monitors the behavior of programs, and provides proactive protection from yet-unknown versions of Trojans. Most importantly, the tool can back up files opened by suspicious applications and roll back the changes if the actions taken by programs prove malicious. Through collaboration: The No More Ransom Initiative On 25 July 2016, the Dutch National Police, Europol, Intel Security and Kaspersky Lab announced the launch of the No More Ransom project – a non-commercial initiative that unites public and private organizations and aims to inform people of the dangers of ransomware and help them to recover their data. The online portal currently carries eight decryption tools, five of which were made by Kaspersky Lab.
These can help to restore files encrypted by more than 20 types of cryptomalware.
To date, more than 4,400 victims have got their data back – and more than $1.5 million dollars in ransom demands has been saved. No More Ransom has so far got 4.400 people their data back – and deprived criminals of $1.5 million in ransom #KLReport Tweet In October, law enforcement agencies from a further 13 countries joined the project, including: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Colombia, France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Eurojust and the European Commission also support the project’s objectives, and more partners from the private sector and law enforcement are expected to be announced soon. “Public/Private partnerships are the essence and the strength of the NMR initiative.
They are essential to effectively and efficiently tackle the problem, providing us with much greater capability and reach than law enforcement could have alone.” Steven Wilson, Head of Europol’s EC3 Standing up to ransomware – how to stay safe Back up data regularly. Use a reliable security solution, and remember to keep key features – such as System Watcher – switched on. Always keep software updated on all the devices you use. Treat email attachments, or messages from people you don’t know, with caution.
If in doubt, don’t open it. If you’re a business, you should also educate your employees and IT teams; keep sensitive data separate; restrict access; and back up everything, always. If you are unlucky enough to fall victim to an encryptor, don’t panic. Use a clean system to check our No More Ransom site; you may well find a decryption tool that can help you get your files back. Last, but not least, remember that ransomware is a criminal offence. Report it to your local law enforcement agency. “We urge people to report an attack.
Every victim holds an essential piece of evidence that provides invaluable insight.
In return, we can keep them informed and protect them from dodgy third-party ‘offers’ to unencrypt data.
But we need to ensure that more law enforcement offices know how to deal with digital crime.” Ton Maas, Digital team Coordinator with the Dutch National High Tech Crime unit Why you shouldn’t pay – advice from the Dutch National High Tech Crime Unit You become a bigger target. You can’t trust criminals – you may never get your data back, even if you pay. Your next ransom will be higher. You encourage the criminals. Can we ever win the fight against ransomware? We believe we can – but only by working together. Ransomware is a lucrative criminal business.
To make it stop the world needs to unite to disrupt the criminals’ kill-chain and make it increasingly difficult for them to implement and profit from their attacks. 1Estimates based on: 17% of 372,602 unique users with ransomware attacks blocked by Kaspersky Lab products in Q1, 2016 and 23.9% of 821,865 unique users with ransomware attacks blocked by Kaspersky Lab products in Q3,2016.
It was renamed Rubik's Cube in 1980 and exported to the west. More than 350 million cubes have been sold since. Rubik's Cube received a three-dimensional trademark on its shape in 1999, but that was challenged in 2006, when German company Simba Toys took the case to court.
Simba argued that the design, with its nine miniature moving cubes, should be protected with a patent rather than a trademark.
It lost in lower court, but the company now has won big with the ECJ ruling. Having lost to a competing toy company, it seems logical that the market will soon have lower-priced imitations available. However, the president of Rubik's Brand in the UK told The Guardian that while they're disappointed, they have other trademarks and copyright "to ensure [the] exclusivity" of the cube. "[T]his judgment sets a damaging precedent for companies wishing to innovate and create strong brands and distinctive marks within the EU, and is not what European lawmakers intended when they legislated for 3D trademarks," he added. "We are baffled that the court finds functionality or a technical solution implicit in the trademark." "In our opinion the Magic Cube involves a technical solution consisting of its rotating capacity," Simba spokeswoman Isabel Weishar told the Financial Times. "Therefore, it may be protected only by a patent and not as a trademark. Now, 10 years after starting this lawsuit, the court decided in our favor." 3D trademarks are allowed under European law, but they don't always hold up when challenged. Most famously, Nestle failed to get a 3D trademark on the shape of its Kit Kat bars in the UK after a court decision last year.
Search.cgi also has a command injection vulnerability that lets an attacker get root on the target; If you need to bypass authentication – remember, there's no credential protection anyway – there are two vectors, either via video plugins stored in the Web root; or via /cgi-bin/nobody; Someone figured login needed a captcha; to stop the captcha irritating developers, there's a login=quick parameter that nobody thought to remove. Oh, and the captcha can be bypassed if an attacker manually sets the appropriate cookie in their request. The researchers say they pressed the “publish” button after trying to contact Avtech in October 2015, and twice in May 2016. ®
The finding means that ExtraBacon poses a bigger threat than many security experts may have believed. SilentSignal The newly modified exploit is the work of SilentSignal, a penetration testing firm located in Budapest, Hungary.
In an e-mail, SilentSignal researcher Balint Varga-Perke wrote: We first started to work on the exploit mainly to see how easy it would be to add support for other (newer) versions.
Turns out it is very easy, that implies two things: The leaked code is not as poor quality as some might suggest The lack of exploit mitigation techniques in the target Cisco software makes the life of attackers very easy As Ars previously reported, the zero-day exploit allows remote attackers who have already gained a foothold in a targeted network to take full control of a firewall.
It was one of more than a dozen highly advanced attacks that was part of a mysterious leak by a previously unknown group calling itself the ShadowBrokers. Researchers say digital fingerprints left inside the code all but prove the attacks belonged to the Equation Group, an elite hacking crew with ties to the NSA-sponsored Stuxnet and Flame malware that targeted Iran and the Middle East. Michael Toecker, an engineer at a firm called Context Industrial Security, has analyzed ExtraBacon and found that it was designed to work only with versions 8.4(4) and earlier of ASA. He provided the following screenshot to illustrate the restrictions. Enlarge Michael Toecker The success of the modified exploit "demonstrates just how persistent a vulnerability in code can be, how it moves into new versions unless it's found and eradicated," Toecker told Ars. "I don't know who built ExtraBacon, but thousands of users in the US are now vulnerable to the same exploit because nobody told Cisco their SNMP code was busted, and the vulnerable code continued into later versions." Toecker went on to say that the vulnerability of later ASA versions likely didn't take Cisco by surprise. Near the bottom of a post that Cisco published last week in response to the ShadowBrokers leak, the company's principal engineer, Omar Santos, reported that ExtraBacon caused ASA version 9.4(1) to seize up and stop working.
Such crashes are often the first sign of a bug that, when properly exploited, allows an attacker to remotely execute malicious code. Cisco engineers have released software that allows ASA customers to detect and stop ExtraBacon-powered attacks, but the company has yet to actually patch the underlying bug.
The ShadowBrokers release means that advanced attacks can be carried out by a much wider base of hackers than would normally be possible. "We have test equipment and custom firmware images that make debugging easier," Varga-Perke of SilentSignal said. "These are most likely available for malicious parties, too; we are quite confident that similar code exists in private hands." As Ars and Cisco have noted previously, the ExtraBacon exploit requires attackers to already have compromised parts of a targeted network.
That requirement and the bar Varga-Perke described for modifying ExtraBacon means it's probably prohibitively difficult for script kiddies to exploit newer versions of ASA.
Still, for more talented hackers, there's no longer any debate. People running ASA should make sure they've installed last week's exploit signature and the upcoming patch as soon as it's available.
Some were new entries, and others were for previously approved workers who were either renewing or updating their status. Of that number, 2,234 of the H-1B visa holders were from Pakistan, a country that might appear on a Trump list.
Another 1,102 approved visa holders were from Iran.
There were 658 H-1B visa holders from Egypt, and 256 were from Syria. (Article continues below chart.) Country of Birth for H-1B Visa Holders Country Frequency INDIA 262,730 CHINA 29,936 CANADA 7,653 PHILIPPINES 6,055 KOREA, SOUTH 5,024 UNITED KINGDOM 3,822 MEXICO 3,216 TAIWAN 2,785 FRANCE 2,570 JAPAN 2,268 PAKISTAN 2,234 NEPAL 1,997 GERMANY 1,895 TURKEY 1,850 BRAZIL 1,831 ITALY 1,497 COLOMBIA 1,491 RUSSIA 1,461 VENEZUELA 1,432 SPAIN 1,329 IRAN 1,102 NIGERIA 1,015 ISRAEL 949 IRELAND 932 KOREA 813 UKRAINE 795 ARGENTINA 778 MALAYSIA 771 SINGAPORE 755 VIETNAM 695 EGYPT 658 ROMANIA 648 BANGLADESH 647 INDONESIA 637 SRI LANKA 608 PERU 583 POLAND 576 AUSTRALIA 564 GREECE 556 SOUTH AFRICA 547 HONG KONG 503 BULGARIA 477 THAILAND 476 LEBANON 462 JAMAICA 461 KENYA 437 NETHERLANDS 432 JORDAN 415 CHILE 395 SWEDEN 374 NEW ZEALAND 353 GHANA 341 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 333 ECUADOR 302 SYRIA 256 PORTUGAL 253 SWITZERLAND 249 BELGIUM 238 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 231 SAUDI ARABIA 205 ZIMBABWE 205 HUNGARY 203 Spain 189 AUSTRIA 179 UNKNOWN 179 DENMARK 174 HONDURAS 171 COSTA RICA 165 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 155 BOLIVIA 150 CZECH REPUBLIC 149 GUATEMALA 149 EL SALVADOR 147 SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO 142 KUWAIT 141 MOROCCO 138 ETHIOPIA 133 CAMEROON 126 FINLAND 125 BAHAMAS 123 MOLDOVA 111 KAZAKHSTAN 108 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 103 CROATIA 102 NORWAY 102 ARMENIA 101 UZBEKISTAN 101 PANAMA 99 URUGUAY 94 ALBANIA 88 UGANDA 88 USSR 87 Serbia 86 LIBYA 84 MONGOLIA 83 TANZANIA 83 BURMA 76 NIGER 74 LITHUANIA 70 GEORGIA 66 GRENADA 58 SENEGAL 58 BARBADOS 57 MACEDONIA 56 LATVIA 54 AZERBAIJAN 52 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA 51 CYPRUS 51 ST. LUCIA 51 IRAQ 50 SLOVENIA 50 BELIZE 48 ICELAND 47 ZAMBIA 47 GUYANA 45 NICARAGUA 45 PARAGUAY 45 BAHRAIN 43 TUNISIA 43 ALGERIA 42 MAURITIUS 42 DOMINICA 40 USA 39 ESTONIA 35 KYRGYZSTAN 34 HAITI 30 RWANDA 28 BURKINA FASO 26 MACAU 25 TURKMENISTAN 25 CAMBODIA 24 COTE D'IVOIRE 24 TAJIKISTAN 24 CONGO 22 ST. KITTS-NEVIS 22 SUDAN 22 MALAWI 21 OMAN 21 ST.
VINCENT/GRENADINES 21 MALI 20 ANTIGUA-BARBUDA 19 BOTSWANA 18 IVORY COAST 18 BERMUDA 17 BENIN 16 AFGHANISTAN 15 Kosovo 15 QATAR 15 LUXEMBOURG 13 MADAGASCAR 13 Montenegro 13 YEMEN-SANAA 13 TOGO 12 SIERRA LEONE 11 YUGOSLAVIA 11 GABON 10 GAMBIA 10 NORTHERN IRELAND 10 MALTA 8 NAMIBIA 8 SURINAME 8 SWAZILAND 8 BHUTAN 7 FIJI 7 FRENCH POLYNESIA 7 MOZAMBIQUE 7 BURUNDI 6 CUBA 6 GUINEA 6 LIBERIA 6 BRUNEI 5 NETHERLANDS ANTILLES 5 ARUBA 4 ERITREA 4 KIRIBATI 4 LESOTHO 4 MALDIVES 4 MAURITANIA 4 ANGOLA 3 CAPE VERDE 3 CHAD 3 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO 3 SEYCHELLES 3 UNITED STATES 3 ANGUILLA 2 LAOS 2 SOMALIA 2 ARABIAN PENINSULA 1 CAYMAN ISLANDS 1 DJIBOUTI 1 GERMANY, WEST 1 GIBRALTAR 1 GUINEA-BISSAU 1 MARTINIQUE 1 MONACO 1 REUNION 1 Samoa 1 SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE 1 ST.
VINCENT-GRENADINES 1 STATELESS 1 TONGA 1 TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS 1 VANUATU 1 Source: USCIS data for approved applications in fiscal year 2014 Trump's plan to admit only people "who share our values and respect our people" didn't indicate how it would be applied.
It also didn't say whether all visa holders -- visitor, H-1B and green card -- would be subject to an ideological litmus test. And what is the correct answer to such a question about American values? "If you ask people born in this country what is an American ideology, I'm not quite sure that we would come out with one answer," said Jessica Lavariega-Monforti, a professor and chair of the political science department at Pace University in New York. "The immigration system, as it currently stands, could not process additional vetting without creating backlogs and increasing wait times for applicants.
At the same time, it is unclear how these policy changes would increase safety against a terrorist attack," said Lavariega-Monforti. John Lawit, an immigration attorney in Irving, Texas, said the U.S. already has a vetting process that begins as soon as someone applies for a tourist visa.
There are different levels of threat, such as being a citizen of Syria, that trigger a much higher level of vetting, he said. "There is a huge financial commitment that must be made in terms of human resources in order to carry on such a vetting program, and a huge, huge increase in fees,” Lawit said. Requiring oaths of some kind is "a lot of posturing with very little substance," he added, and are ineffective in improving security. Lawit said he once assisted H-1B workers who were employed in non-classified jobs at the Sandia and Los Alamos National Laboratories.
The processing time for security checks could run months.
That's an example of extreme vetting, while "extraordinary detailed security investigations are conducted," he said. This story, "Trump's 'extreme' anti-terrorism vetting may be H-1B nightmare" was originally published by Computerworld.