15.1 C
London
Saturday, August 19, 2017
Home Tags Security camera

Tag: security camera

Researchers have found that it's trivial to remotely access one brand of security camera.
This versatile and reasonably-priced IP65-rated camera is suitable for small businesses as well as homes.
This versatile and reasonably-priced IP65-rated camera is suitable for small businesses as well as homes.
Cloud-based video management specialist Eagle Eye Networks expands its global reach by acquiring Panasonic's video surveillance solution.
Plus savings on dash cams, smart TVs, monitors, smart vacuums, and more.
$10 in Amazon money for trying out its music platform! What a deal.
Bad code or backdoor? Whichever it was, patch it now Chinese security camera/DVR company Dahua is pushing firmware patches after accusations by a security researcher that a swathe of its products carried a back door.…
Kuna is a smart home security camera in a stylish outdoor light that detects and allows you to interact with people outside your door. The security device includes HD live and recorded video, two-way intercom, alarm, smart motion detection alerts to your phone, and more. Easy 15 minute installation with no batteries to replace so you have continuous protection around the clock. Be protected at all times - Access HD live video with its 720P wide angle camera, communicate via its two way intercom from your mobile device, or activate its 100 dB alarm siren.
Smart light control lets you turn on or off your lights remotely, or program a schedule for when you're away. Access live video or review & download events for 2 hours free or up to 30-days on an optional subscription plan, starting as low as $4.99 per month.

This Kuna security light averages 4 out of 5 stars from over 600 people (read reviews), and its typical list price of $199 has been reduced 25% to $149.
See the discounted Kuna Smart Home Security Light and Camera on Amazon.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
The Arlo camera is a 100 Percent Wire-Free, completely wireless, HD smart home security camera – so you can get exactly the shot you need – inside or out.

The Arlo camera is weatherproof and includes motion detection, night vision, and apps.
It can capture clips and send you alerts whether you’re at home or away for round-the-clock peace of mind.  These motion activated cameras initiate automatic recording and alert you via email or app notifications.

Free apps enable remote monitoring from anywhere and with the built-in night vision you’ll even see in dark.  This security camera currently averages 4 out of 5 stars on Amazon from almost 10,000 customers (read reviews) and its list price of $219.99 is currently discounted 41% to $129.99. This story, "41% off Netgear Arlo Security System Wireless HD Camera, Indoor/Outdoor, Night Vision - Deal Alert" was originally published by TechConnect.
IoT vendor in prompt, polite, sensible, security shocker IoT security camera vendor UCam247 has contacted The Register to say most devices in the wild aren't vulnerable to the “single URL pwnage” vulnerability. Yesterday, we reported that more than 30 cameras from seven vendors had shipped with a modified GoAhead Web server. Among other things, the modification introduced a simple-to-the-point-of-stupidity pre-authentication buffer overrun: a URL longer than 256 bytes is copied to a 256-character stack. We contacted all the affected vendors, and to its credit, UCam247's managing director Paresh Morjaria has responded. We provide his full response below: Thanks for making us aware of the potential bug in the firmware used in both our IP cameras and those of many other brands that sell in the UK. Our firmware engineers have advised that in their testing the potential exploit is not an issue in firmware version 6.10 and above and should not be a issue. The vast majority of our customers are now using v6.14 and later but those that are still running firmware older than 6.10 will be contacted to advise them to update the firmware asap. That said, we have asked our engineers to continue testing this and other related work around exploits that 'may' exist just to ensure the bug is patched for as necessary and fully.

A new firmware is due to be released within the next couple of weeks containing some additional functional updates and any new fixes for this exploit will be rolled out in that as a matter of course. Regards Paresh Morjaria MD, UCam247 And from El Reg, thanks Paresh for keeping an eye on the inbox. ® Sponsored: Customer Identity and Access Management
All your cameras are belong to Mirai Robert Graham, CEO of Errata Security, on Friday documented his experience setting up a $55 JideTech security camera behind a Raspberry Pi router configured to isolate the camera from his home network. According to Graham's series of Twitter posts, his camera was taken over by the Mirai botnet in just 98 seconds. Mirai conducts a brute force password attack via telnet using 61 default credentials to gain access to the DVR software in video cameras and to other devices such as routers and CCTV cameras. After the first stage of Mirai loads, "it then connects out to download the full virus," Graham said in a Twitter post. "Once it downloads that, it runs it and starts spewing out SYN packets at a high rate of speed, looking for new victims." Graham said the defense recommended by the Christian Science Monitor – changing the default password of devices before connecting them to the Internet – doesn't help because his Mirai-infected camera has a telnet password that cannot be changed. "The correct mitigation is 'put these devices behind your firewall'," Graham said. ® Sponsored: Customer Identity and Access Management
Back in January, I wrote one of my most popular posts ever: “Why you don’t need an RFID-blocking wallet.” As the title suggests, I argued that it’s a waste of money to buy a wallet with special shielding to protect your chipped credit card from RFID scanners wielded by street criminals seeking to snatch your credit card number. Since then, in true internet tradition, I’ve been called an idiot by dozens of people and received emails from RFID vendors saying I’m a disgrace—the latter begging me to tell people they also need a Faraday bag for their cellphones. (Tip: If you don’t want anyone tracking you via GPS, turn off your cellphone’s GPS feature.) I’ve also been emailed by people who are 100 percent sure, without any real evidence, that they were the victims of RFID-scanning criminals. Part of the confusion stems from the fact that many, if not most, people now have chip-and-pin cards—you can see the shiny chip right on the card, which you stick into a card reader (instead of sliding the card through). People assume chip-and-pin cards are vulnerable to scanning, but they’re not. RFID cards are contactless—and very likely you don’t have one. Still waiting Every story about the risks of RFID scanners features a white hat hacker showing it can be done, but not a shred of evidence has emerged that bad guys are sitting on popular corners wirelessly stealing credit card numbers. I still haven’t heard of a single case of real-life RFID scanning criminality. Even the wallet vendors’ websites have no verifiable links or testimonies from actual victims. To be honest, at this point, I’m surprised an RFID-protection vendor hasn’t paid a criminal to get caught, so they could point to a real-life story. Plenty of “believers” have told me it’s obvious why the real RFID scanning criminals haven’t been caught yet—it’s a wireless crime. In their world, it’s impossible to catch wireless criminals. Never mind that we’ve been successfully tracking criminals wirelessly and prosecuting them for decades. If there were a huge contingent of RFID criminals, we would eventually catch some, and it would be such big news that it would spread like wildfire across the internet. If someone stole a credit card number using an RFID scanner, created a counterfeit card, and got busted, as part of the plea agreement the accused would reveal exactly how the crime had been committed. This plea would have details about the scanner, the victims, and how much money had been stolen. That’s how our justice system works. Where are those stories? Even the popular debunking website Snopes.com has commented on RFID crime, giving it a “Mixture” truth rating. Why “Mixture”? Because it can’t find any real evidence RFID theft is occurring, although it debunks at least one news source that claimed to show a real RFID criminal. Make no mistake—criminals who want to make money know about this supposedly easy crime. Hacker researchers have been writing about the risks since RFID-enabled items first came out. Here’s an article from industry luminary Bruce Schneier from 2006. Not cost efficient Given all this, you might be surprised to learn I think that RFID-scanning criminals do exist. There are nearly 100 videos on the internet from all over the world showing good guy hackers demonstrating how it can be done. It’s a potential risk. But because the real-life occurrence is so rare, it’s a small risk. Why? Because it’s not cost-efficient. Real-life criminals steal credit card numbers all the time, but they don’t sit on corners for hours hoping to catch a few dozen card numbers. They steal hundreds of thousands of cards and resell them for cheap to anyone who wants to buy them. In 10 minutes, any criminal with enough smarts to even know what RFID scanning is can spend a $100 to buy 1,000 credit card numbers off the internet from any number of illegal dealers, with far less risk of being captured on a security camera. Focus on real threats I have no problem with someone buying an RFID-protecting wallet or a Faraday bag for a cellphone or car keys. We all make our own risk and buying decisions on a daily basis. I’m just saying that for most people it doesn’t make much sense. We’re each hit by a myriad of risks every day. In the computer world alone, we get introduced to somewhere around 13 to 16 new individual security vulnerabilities every day, year after year. They never stop coming. A prudent person looks at the various risks, weighs the likelihood and potential damage of each of them against the other, and picks those to spend time and money on. I use the example of people who visit me in Key Largo: Almost all of my visitors worry about potential shark attacks when we go snorkeling and diving. Some are so terrified they won’t get in the water. I tell them there has never been a documented, unprovoked shark attack in the history of Key Largo (at least since the 1800s, if not earlier). The risk of shark attacks worldwide is something like one in 1 million (70 to 100 deaths among hundreds of millions of potential encounters). But the odds that those same people might be killed by driving their car to my house are about 1 in 12,300. As humans, we are terrible at ranking risks, even when told the true odds. Where I was wrong I have one update to the original post: I said most of the credit cards in the world don’t have RFID in them. That’s still true. But in some countries, like Canada and Poland, RFID-enabled credit cards are the norm. Even in those countries, I can’t find reports of real RFID-scanning criminals. Of course, cases of RFID-scanning criminals caught by police may simply have not made it to the web yet—but you’d think that the dozens of vendors selling RFID-protecting wallets and purses would be linking to those stories like crazy. Guess what? They haven’t. Still, if I haven’t convinced you, go ahead and buy that RFID-protecting wallet. It’s your money and your risk decision. Me, I’ll wait until I hear that RFID crime is on the rise—or better yet, until I have an RFID-enabled credit card. Friends who have shown me their RFID wallets did so because their new credit cards came with a chip, which they assumed was RFID in nature. It wasn’t. They were carrying the regular, nonwireless, chip-and-pin cards.